| ๚@@F | ฝฌ27N36๚(เ)@14:00`15:00 | |
| ๏@@๊F | ท่ๅwถณLpX@Hw1ู2F@5ิu`บ iท่sถณฌ1|14j |
|
| u@@tF | Dr. Mark Mulder iDelft University of Technology, the Netherlandsj |
|
| u`ฺ่F | Shared Control: Support on the Boundaries of Automation | |
| T@@vF | According to Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, in their recent best-selling book "The Second Machine Age," technology is improving so quickly and on such a large scale that it will upend the way our society works. Autonomous cars will take over the highways and large computer networks will diagnose disease faster and more accurately than human doctors can. The paradox of this drive towards automation is that in automated systems that need to be supervised by humans (cars, aircraft, power plants, etc.) the more the system is automated, the more crucial the contribution of the human is when there is a need for intervention. Hence, human factors considerations in designing automation are more important than ever before. Over the past decades the principles of shared control have been gaining interest in the research and engineering community as a design approach that integrates the best of both worlds: the fast, reliable, precise and inexhaustible task execution capabilities of automation and the complementary inventive, adaptive and interactive task execution skills of humans. Recent research has shown that shared control can enhance the capabilities of both human and automation in a wide variety of applications (driving, flying, wheelchair control, tele-operation of robots, etc.). We believe that the strength of shared control is found in making automation boundaries visible thereby allowing skilful, timely and effective human intervention in case of automation malfunction. | |
| Qม๏F | ณฟ | |
| O\F | sv | |
| โนๆF | c วKiytnkyatznagasaki-u.ac.jpj ท่ๅw ๅw@Hwคศ |